MIAMI HERALD EDITORIAL
Firing hundreds of people at the Federal Emergency Management Agency may sound like a great idea to those who agree with President Donald Trump’s shock-and-awe plan to cut federal spending and shrink a bloated bureaucracy.
But guess who will get to test out the theory that those employees were unnecessary — like it or not?
We will. Florida’s hurricane-prone shores will land us right on the front lines of the FEMA wars.
Last year, we had back-to-back hurricanes hit the West Coast.
Still recovering
Residents there are still recovering from the powerful strikes of hurricanes Helene and Milton that drove flooding inland and destroyed homes and businesses.
The 2025 hurricane season is right around the corner. It runs from June 1 to Nov. 30. Even if it’s half as bad as last year, Florida will be needing a lot of help from FEMA.
But how much of FEMA will still be there?
Trump has talked about “getting rid of” FEMA and criticized its North Carolina response to Hurricane Helene. In January, he set up a FEMA review council, which is being overseen by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.
An easy target
To a certain extent, everyone loves to hate FEMA.
It’s an easy target — part of the faceless federal government.
Critics have said for years that it is slow to respond, and that’s often true. The paperwork is beyond complicated and workers are often pulled to multiple disasters, leading to short-staffing and customer service gripes.
And yet, if you’re one of the people trying to recover from a disaster like those two hurricanes, which caused billions of dollars in damage, FEMA can be a literal lifesaver.
The agency doles out grants, removes sometimes-toxic debris, opens disaster recovery centers and provides hotel stays when you have no place to call home.
After Hurricane Milton, FEMA approved more than $252 million in assistance to more than 174,000 households and $631 million in public assistance for debris removal.
The agency has had some highly public issues. Last year, for example, a FEMA worker was fired, rightfully, for telling a team of workers in Florida not to respond to homes with Trump signs.
Politics should have no place in disaster relief.
Costing more, covering less
One thing that seems to get lost in the confusion about post-disaster aid: FEMA is the first wave of help, while insurance is supposed to pick up the rest. (Good luck to us in Florida, where insurance keeps costing more and covering less.)
These cuts won’t just affect Florida, of course. Disasters can hit any portion of the country. Kentucky, for example, was recently hit by flooding rains, with more severe weather still to come.
Dramatically cutting the agency, especially in such a hasty way, isn’t going to help. It’ll do the opposite.
With hundreds gone from the FEMA workforce, payments will no doubt become slower and customer service will worsen. And those were already sore points.
The agency has been stretched too thin, with billion-dollar disasters like the hurricanes followed by the fires in California. Slashing personnel will only make that issue more acute.
And there’s the question of which people are being cut. The purge started out targeting only probationary employees, but has expanded to others.
Now E&E News and other news outlets are reporting that the next wave of firings will go after staff members involved with climate change, equity or diversity. That’s not about efficiency — it’s about politics.
Climate expertise is essential for an agency that must prepare for and respond to severe weather events. And with scientists predicting more frequent and intense storms due to climate change, Florida needs FEMA now more than ever.
This opinion piece was originally published by the Miami Herald and distributed by The Invading Sea website (theinvadingsea.com). The site posts news and commentary on climate change and other environmental issues affecting Florida.
Comments